DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 $. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22264-2480
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
BC
Docket No: 08602-13
26 June 2014 ,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
5 November 1990, at age 18. On 8 April 1994, you received
nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for sleeping on watch. In your
final evaluation you were not recommended for retention. On 4
November 1994, you were honorably discharged from active duty
while serving in pay grade E-2. You were assigned an RE-4 (not
recommended for retention) reentry code.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors present in your case.
Nevertheless, the Board concluded those factors were
insufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code based on
your record of service, misconduct and non-recommendation for
retention in pay grade E-2. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry
code is required when an individual is discharged at the
expiration of his term of enlistment and is not recommended for
"Be.
retention. *Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material: evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D.~ZSALMAN |
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3577-13
© A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 23 November 1997, you completed your Navy Reserve obligation, were honorably discharged in pay grade E-3, and not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7667 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in your case, such as your prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02715-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 November 2011. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of enlistment and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7592 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found those factors insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service, given your record of one NJP for wrongful use of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3434-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, togéther with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR021 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. An RE-4 reentry code is required when a Marine is discharged due to misconduct and is not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3108 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. It was also noted on that evaluation that you had received three NJP’s and were not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0537 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July -2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded those factors insufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code based on non-recommendation for retention in pay grade E-3. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10584-10
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative ‘regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, reguiations, and policies. On 25 June 1994, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-2 and assigned an RE-4 (not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00979-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 December 1994, you were advised that your commanding officer was recommending you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an andividual is discharged for misconduct and is not...